Hertz Corp. v. Pippin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In the case at bench, we consider an issue certified to us by the Appellate Department of the Los Angeles Superior Court as: “Since the amendment of section 17150 of the Vehicle Code in 1967, may the owner of a rented automobile damaged by the concurrent negligence of the hirer and the driver of another vehicle recover from the latter?” As did the appellate department, we answer that question in the affirmative. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the municipal court from which this appeal is taken and remand the cause for determination of the amount of appellant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maloney v. RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Milgate v. WraithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Syah v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Bayless v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Rogers v. FoppianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rashtian v. Brac-BH, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Hitchcock v. Mercury Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997