Legal Opinion

Maloney v. Rath

California Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1968No. S. F. No. 22596PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries to her person and property incurred in an automobile accident. She appeals from an adverse judgment and from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of liability.

*444Plaintiff stopped her car in a left-turn lane to wait for a traffic signal to change. Defendant turned into the left-turn lane behind plaintiff and stepped on her brake pedal. Defendant ’s brakes failed, and a collision ensued.

Defendant neither knew nor had reason to know that her brakes were defective until they failed. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Stead Motors of Walnut Creek v. Automotive MacHinists Lodge No. 1173, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Bostrom v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API