Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Mercury Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1997No. G020040PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Kara Hitchcock appeals from an adverse judgment filed in favor of Mercury Insurance Company in her breach of contract action. She contends the court erred in granting Mercury’s motion for summary judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) Affirmed.

I

Kara Hitchcock and her fiancé Jason Apodaca were registered owners of a 1983 Mercedes 190E. In August 1993, Hitchcock secured insurance from Mercury and the following month was involved in an automobile accident. Apodaca, a passenger at the time of accident, was injured. Mercury paid $3,617 for his medical bills.

Unsatisfied, Apodaca…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Schmidt v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Ledgerwood v. LedgerwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Mason v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Hertz Corp. v. PippinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shipman v. Boething Treeland Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Shipman v. Boething Treeland Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API