Legal Opinion

State v. Ramsey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1998No. 96D106989; CA A94848PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals from 18 orders of summary contempt. ORS 33.096.1 The trial court imposed 30 days in jail and a $500 fine for each contempt order with the time to be served consecutively. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by mistakenly treating the first contempt order as a summary contempt; that the trial judge’s refusal to disqualify himself from sentencing defendant violated his right to be sentenced by an impartial judge; that the trial court erred by citing defendant for 17 separate contempt orders during one proceeding instead of one continuing contempt; that the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Taylor v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. City of Klamath Falls v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Bacote v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. LavitskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. LavitskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. LavitskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API