Legal Opinion

State v. Lavitsky

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 3, 1999No. C9601-30472 CA A101772PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

In this state’s appeal from a criminal defendant’s sentence, the state, by motion to determine jurisdiction, has raised the issue of whether defendant’s release to the custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for eventual deportation has rendered the appeal moot. We conclude that the appeal is not moot because the imposition of a longer sentence will have a practical effect on the right of the state to reincarcerate defendant and the obligation of defendant to serve a longer sentence. Accordingly, this court continues to have jurisdiction to determine the merits of this appeal.

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Oregon Republican Party v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API