Legal Opinion
Hydraulic Exchange & Repair, Inc. v. KM Specialty Pumps, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1998No. 87A04-9705-CV-174PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On March 5, 1997, KM Specialty Pumps, Inc., and KM Specialty Systems, Inc., (collectively “KM”) filed its complaint against Hydraulic Exchange and Repair, Inc., (“HER”) and Paul Titzer for Breach of Contract, Tor-tious Interference, Damages and Permanent Injunction. The following day, KM filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction which sought to enjoin Titzer and HER from using KM’s customer and pricing information or from contacting KM’s customers. After a hearing, the trial court entered its Temporary Restraining Order and Order for Preliminary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ackerman v. Kimball International, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
- ISC-Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Altech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Ackerman v. Kimball International, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harvest Life Insurance v. GetcheIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Titus v. Rheitone, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Northern Elec. Co., Inc. v. TormaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- U.S. Land Services, Inc. v. U.S. Surveyor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.