Legal Opinion

Titus v. Rheitone, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2001No. 29A05-0105-CV-209PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Chery] Titus' ("Titus") interlocutory appeal challenges the trial court's grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of Rhei-tone, Inc. ("Rheitone").

We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Whether the trial court erroneously granted Rheitone's motion for preliminary injunction.

2. Whether the Indiana Trial Rule 65(C) security bond was sufficient.

FACTS

Rheitone is an Indiana corporation engaged in the pre-press business. 1 From 1991 until 2000, Titus was employed by Rheitone and earned a salary ranging from $26,000 to $84,000. Titus' most recent position was Vice President…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Burk v. Heritage Food Service Equipment, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Howard D. Johnson Co. v. Parkside Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gleeson v. Preferred Sourcing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Robert's Hair Designers, Inc. v. PearsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Unger v. FFW CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. AGS Capital Corp. v. Product Action International, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Mayer v. BMR PROPERTIES, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API