Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. Kimball International, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 1994No. 19A04-9311-CV-416PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
John C. Ackerman brings a mandatory interlocutory appeal pursuant to Appellate Rule 4(B)(8) from the trial court's entry of a preliminary injunction against him and in favor of Ackerman's former employer, Kim-ball International, Inc. Kimball terminated Ackerman's employment in August of 1998 under a provision in Ackerman's employment agreement reserving that right. After executing a termination agreement which granted him severance pay and other benefits, Ackerman immediately accepted a position with one of Kimball's competitors. Kimball then sought a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Woodward Insurance, Inc. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGSMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Ackerman v. Kimball International, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Orem v. Ivy Tech State CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hydraulic Exchange & Repair, Inc. v. KM Specialty Pumps, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.