Legal Opinion
County of Sutter v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1989No. C005311PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
This appeal tenders the question whether family support investigators employed by the District Attorney of the County of Sutter are entitled to enhanced retirement benefits (Gov. Code, § 21251.13) 1 as “county peace officers” under section 20021.5 when his practice and policy is to enforce parental support obligations primarily by civil rather than criminal action.
The Board of Administration, Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) administratively determined that the employees meet the statutory criterion of section 20021.5—that their “principal duties are to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Hicks v. Bd. of Supervisors of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- California Trout, Inc. v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Abbott Labs. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cory v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.