Legal Opinion
Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 2011No. A130659PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARGULIES, J.
The trial court ordered the Sonoma County Employees’ Retirement Association (SCERA) to disclose to real party in interest, The *990Press Democrat, the names of all persons receiving SCERA pension benefits, the gross amount of each recipient’s benefit, and the recipient’s age at retirement. SCERA petitions for a writ of mandate to overturn the trial court’s order, contending the information sought is exempt from disclosure under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Government Code section 31450 et seq. (CERL).1 We hold SCERA need not disclose the ages of its benefit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Regents v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014