Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1990No. 45PA89PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

Defendant first argues that there was not sufficient evidence to submit either of the issues to the jury. N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21(b)(2) provides in part:(b) Such owner’s policy of liability insurance:(2) Shall insure the person named therein and any other person, as insured, using any such motor vehicle or motor vehicles with the express or implied permission of such named insured, or any other persons in lawful possession, against loss from the liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such motor vehicle[.]

N.C.G.S. § 20-279.21(b)(3)b…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Proctor v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richard Blanchard v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Lozada v. Phoenix InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
  3. Integon National Insurance v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Taylor v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API