Legal Opinion

Lozada v. Phoenix Insurance

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided January 2, 2003No. 1:00-cv-01158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEATY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Raul G. Lozada’s Motion for Sum mary Judgment [Document # 15] and Defendant Phoenix Insurance Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Document # 18]. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment shall be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. With respect to the separate issue of Plaintiffs claim of unfair and deceptive trade practices, Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall also be GRANTED.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 13, 1999,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blake v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. GelshenenDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. Erie Insurance Exchange v. First United Methodist ChurchDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2010
  4. CRAIGE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API