Legal Opinion
Reich v. Local 30, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 6, 1993No. 91-3799PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
1 Reasonableness does not have a bright line definition. What is reasonable varies with the circumstances. Congress has specifically allowed labor unions to impose “reasonable qualifications” upon the eligibility of union members to be candidates in union elections. In this appeal, we must determine whether a union bylaw, which restricts such eligibility, is reasonable. The Secretary of Labor has argued that it is not.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary. The Secre-. tary’s complaint alleged that Local 30 of the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cohen v. KurtzmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Reich v. Local 396, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Reich v. Local 30Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Dimondstein v. American Postal Workers UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Herman v. Local 305, National Postal Mail Handlers UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.