Legal Opinion

Dimondstein v. American Postal Workers Union

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-1228PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mark Dimondstein, Tony McKinnon, and Violetta Ward (“Plaintiffs”) have filed suit against Defendant the American Postal Workers Union (“Defendant” or “APWU”), challenging the Defendant labor union’s refusal to disseminate Plaintiff’s campaign literature via e-mail at Plaintiffs’ expense. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ [2] Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Upon consideration of the pleadings 1 , the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court finds that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Sherley v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  5. Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Noble, Jr. v. National Association of Letter CarriersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  2. Arundell v. United Federation of TeachersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API