Legal Opinion

Sambs v. Nowak

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1970No. 231PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Several issues are raised by the city’s appeal. They are:

1. Was the plaintiff’s “notice of claim” sufficient to meet the requirements of sec. 62.25, Stats. ?

2. Is the city estopped from requiring compliance with sec. 62.25, Stats. ?

3. Is the allegation that the city, by acquiring liability insurance, rendered sec. 62.25, Stats., ineffective, a new claim barred by the statute of limitations ?

4. Did the city, by acquiring liability insurance, render sec. 62.25, Stats., ineffective?

1. Was the “notice of claim” effective under sec. 62.25, Stats.? Since there is no factual issue presented for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Marshall v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Firemen's Insurance v. Washburn CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gutter v. SeamandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Figgs v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API