Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Sledge
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho district court; L. Stillwell, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J.:
The defendant in error had judgment in the court below, and the railroad company prosecutes this proceeding to reverse it. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows :■ Sledge had been in the employ of the railroad company about a year before the injury complained of. Most of the time die was a brakeman, but at the time of his injury, and for a month prior thereto, he was a switchman in the yards at Pittsburg. Together with a switch-engine crew, he went out to do some switching on the morning of December 23, 1901. The engine was properly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Missouri Furnace Co. v. AbendIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Hawley v. . Northern Central Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Rush v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Greenleaf v. Dubuque & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Knock v. Tonopah & Goldfield RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Hernandez v. BachandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.