Legal Opinion

Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. Loosley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1907No. 15,088PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff, alleging himself to be an employee of the defendant, recovered damages for personal injuries sustained through the carelessness of a coemployee whom it was charged the defendant had been negligent in selecting.

The plaintiff had been in railroad service ever since he was eighteen years old, beginning as baggage master about the year 1875. After four or five years he became a freight conductor, and then became a passenger conductor. At the time of his injury he was the conductor of a construction train operated by a construction…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. MaresSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Uppington v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Kelly v. . the Mayor C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pottorff v. Fidelity Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Dohner v. Winfield Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Fishburn v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API