Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Quinlan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1908No. 15,332PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Labette district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*127The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff was a skilled machinist employed by the defendant to work in its shops at Parsons. He was directed to fit a large casting, known as a. smoke-stack saddle, upon the rounded top of the smoke arch of a locomotive. To do this it was necessary to chip off portions of the casting. The plaintiff marked lines on the casting to guide him in dressing it and secured it to a bench to hold it in position. He then held a handled chisel while a helper struck it with a sledge, the chisel being readjusted with reference to the marks on the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rush v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. IrwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fishburn v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Maw v. Coast Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Smith v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Steele v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API