Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Quinlan
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Labette district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*127The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The plaintiff was a skilled machinist employed by the defendant to work in its shops at Parsons. He was directed to fit a large casting, known as a. smoke-stack saddle, upon the rounded top of the smoke arch of a locomotive. To do this it was necessary to chip off portions of the casting. The plaintiff marked lines on the casting to guide him in dressing it and secured it to a bench to hold it in position. He then held a handled chisel while a helper struck it with a sledge, the chisel being readjusted with reference to the marks on the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rush v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. IrwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fishburn v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Maw v. Coast Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Steele v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.