Legal Opinion

Knock v. Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1914No. 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Mark R. Averill, Judge. Action by Frederick A. Knock against the Tonopah and Goldfield Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talbot, C. J.:

The plaintiff, a man 29 years'of age, with eleven years of experience in railroading in various positions, and earning on an average about $170 a month as a conductor and brakeman, instituted this action to recover $25,500 damages for the loss of his right forearm, which was crushed between the couplers of ore cars while he was endeavoring to effect a coupling. The accident necessitated the amputation below the elbow. A verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed. On.this appeal from the judgment and from the order denying the motion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Rodney v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. The FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Weck v. Reno Traction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Harris v. ZeeNevada Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API