Legal Opinion

Martz v. Deitrick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1952No. Appeal, 222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This appeal is from a judgment in mandamus ordering and directing the defendants as members of the salary board of Northumberland County (a county of the fifth class) to take certain specific action with reference to the number of clerks to be employed by the treasurer of the county. The material facts are not in dispute.

The plaintiff, Martz, as county treasurer, and the three defendants, Deitrick, Shroyer and Perles, as county commissioners, took office for the first time on January 7, 1952. The j'emaining defendant, Gibson, was then, and for fourteen years had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. PommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Goodman Et Ux. v. MeadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Dechert v. Commonwealth ex rel. SmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Runkle v. Commonwealth ex rel. KeppelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  5. Horowitz v. BeamishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beckert v. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Penksa v. HoltzmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Green v. Tioga County Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Sukala v. Shope, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1973
  5. Tracy v. Maloney, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API