Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Beamish
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1936No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
The appellant, Horowitz, applied under the Act of June 8, 1893, P. L. 345, as amended, 12 PS section 1911 et seq., for a writ of mandamus to require the secretary of the commonwealth to receive an application 1 for and to issue a certificate of authority to Keystone State Moving Picture Operators Association, a foreign corporation, pursuant to the nonprofit corporation law of May 5, 1933, P. L. 289, 15 P. S. section 2851 — 1 et seq.
The return set forth that the Keystone State Moving Picture Operators Association had failed to comply with the nonprofit corporation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Security Mutual Life Insurance v. PrewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Commonwealth ex rel. Snyder v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Anderson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Goodman Et Ux. v. MeadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Narcise v. Eastern State Pen.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.