Lemon v. Hubbard
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County vacating a default judgment, and giving leave to-plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Paul W. Bennett* Judge. ffhe facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles G. Lamberson, and Frank Lamberson, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
Appeal by defendant Holt Manufacturing Company from an order after judgment vacating such judgment and giving plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint.
The plaintiff on November 10, 1906, filed his complaint against defendants, in which he set up as a first cause of action that between June 1 and November 1, 1906, he had, at the instance and request of defendant Hubbard, performed work in, about and upon a certain threshing-machine, known as the Holt Combined Harvester, while engaged in threshing and in the use and possession of Hubbard, all in the counties of Tulare and Kern; that Hubbard…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Brush v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Mayo v. Ah LoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Blondeau v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Jeffers v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dennison v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Bramwell v. RowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Smith v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Occidental Life Insurance v. NiendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.