Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1978No. 77-1011PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

I

Appellant’s first three propositions of law involve similar issues and will- therefore be considered together. *307The first proposition of law alleges, in essence, that the state of Ohio (appellee) failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any robbery or any attempt thereof was committed' by the appellant. The second proposition alleges a dearth of evidence in respect to the corpus delicti of robbery, and therefore appellant states that the trial court improperly admitted his extrajudicial inculpatory statement. The third proposition claims that there was insufficient evidence to enable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. NicelyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. Van HookOhio Supreme Court · 1988

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API