Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Christy
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1984No. 1-783A232PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff-Appellants Deana and Barry Hardin appeal an adverse jury verdict rendered in their personal injury and loss of consortium action against David K. Christy. The action arose out of an incident in which Christy’s Appaloosa stallion, Plaudit, attacked Deana.
We affirm.
STATEMENT OP THE FACTS
Deana and Barry Hardin both have considerable experience in riding, training, showing, and handling horses. Deana in fact owned her first horse at age twelve. Barry and Deana married in 1972, and at the time of their marriage, they owned 13 horses. The Hardins…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Fleetwood Corp. v. MirichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Smith v. Midwest Mutual Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Klenberg v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Small v. Centocor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Irvine v. Rare Feline Breeding Center, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Forrest v. GilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gyuriak v. MilliceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Schwartz v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.