Legal Opinion

Klenberg v. Russell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1890No. 14,446PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

— This action was instituted by the appellee to recover damages for an injury to her person which she alleged she had suffered because of the negligence of the appellant. Originally there were two paragraphs in the complaint, and two parties defendant to the action, but upon the trial the cause was dismissed as to Mrs. Klenberg, and the first paragraph of complaint withdrawn.

The appellant filed a demurrer to the second paragraph of complaint, and the ruling of the court being adverse to him he saved an exception and filed an answer in general denial.

The cause was tried by a jury who returned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Van Leuven v. Lyke & DumondNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  3. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. HiltzhauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Vrooman v. LawyerNew York Supreme Court · 1816

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Goodwin v. E. B. Nelson Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Poznanski Ex Rel. Poznanski v. HorvathIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fox v. KoehnigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Corey v. Smith CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API