King v. Lane
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error .from County Court, Lincoln County; H. M. Jarrett, Judge. Replevin by L> A. King against T. N. Lane. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, O.
Tbis is a replevin action commenced on the 23d day of October, 1913, by L. A. King, plaintiff in error, against T. N. Lane, defendant in error, for the recovery of the possession of' certain chattels under and by virtue of a chattel mortgage given to secure the payment of a certain promissory note. The petition sets forth the execution of the note and the default in the payment thereof, and1 the execution of the mortgage and the breach of the terms of the mortgage by reason of the failure to pay when ‘due the amount secured, and there is a copy of the note and mortgage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Call v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Fisher v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- Sullivan v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Haley v. Western Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fiegel v. First Nat. Bank of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Williams v. Long Bell Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Branstetter v. Exchange Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936