Legal Opinion
Williams v. Long Bell Lbr. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1950No. 33757PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.
This is an action to foreclose a materialmen’s lien. Long Bell Lumber Company, as plaintiff, sued Opal Foster Williams, whose husband, Cooper Williams, was permitted to intervene as a defendant. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff alleged that it furnished the materials sued for under an oral contract with Opal Foster Williams for the erection of a small residence in the city of Walters, Oklahoma; that the materials were delivered and used and had not been paid for; and that plaintiff had filed its lien statement, as required by law, within 120 days…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- In Re Baptist General Convention of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Selected Investments Corp. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Burke Greis Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Medaris v. TraceySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bates v. WinkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Phillis Development Co. v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Jones v. StrainCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Fisher v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.