Legal Opinion

Bullard v. . Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages caused by a collision of the defendant's truck with the plaintiff's wagon and mules on a public highway. The plaintiff offered evidence that his wagon was damaged, one of his mules killed and the other injured; the defendant contended that the wagon was driven at night without a light on the wrong side of the road. Each party insisted that the other was negligent. The jury returned the following verdict:

1. Was the plaintiff's personal property damaged by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes."

2. Did the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Sledge v. . Reid, Sheriff, C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Allen v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Crane v. . CarswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Pettes v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Henderson v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. May v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Brown v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API