Crane v. . Carswell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The contributory negligence of the plaintiff bars his recovery although damages were assessed upon the third issue. Baker v. R. R., 118 N. C., 1015; Sasser v. Lumber Co., 165 N. C., 242; McKoy v. Craven, 198 N. C., 780; Allen v. Yarborough, 201 N. C., 568. We find' nothing inconsistent in the verdict and his Honor’s refusal to set it aside as a matter of discretion is not reviewable.
There is no reversible error in the instruction complained of. The ordinance referred to is practically the same as the State law. Code, 1931, sec. 2621(58).
No error.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baker v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Allen v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Sasser v. Hales-Bryant Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- McKoy v. . CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pettes v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Bullard v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Bullard v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Baird v. . BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Butler v. GanttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.