Legal Opinion

Brown v. Bass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s assertion of error is based on the contention that the answers given by the jury to the second and third issues *740are so inconsistent that no judgment could be entered thereon and, because of the inconsistency, the verdict should have been set aside in toto and a new trial ordered.

The argument made for plaintiff has been made on several occasions in the past and rejected. Sasser v. Lumber Company, 165 N.C. 242, 81 S.E. 320; Holton v. Moore, 165 N.C. 549, 81 S.E. 779; Oates v. Herrin, 197 N.C. 171, 148 S.E. 30; McKoy v. Craven, 198 N.C. 780, 153 S.E. 412; Allen v. Yarborough, 201…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Bullard v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Crane v. . CarswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Sasser v. Hales-Bryant Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Bullard v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jordan v. FlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API