Brown v. Bass
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s assertion of error is based on the contention that the answers given by the jury to the second and third issues *740are so inconsistent that no judgment could be entered thereon and, because of the inconsistency, the verdict should have been set aside in toto and a new trial ordered.
The argument made for plaintiff has been made on several occasions in the past and rejected. Sasser v. Lumber Company, 165 N.C. 242, 81 S.E. 320; Holton v. Moore, 165 N.C. 549, 81 S.E. 779; Oates v. Herrin, 197 N.C. 171, 148 S.E. 30; McKoy v. Craven, 198 N.C. 780, 153 S.E. 412; Allen v. Yarborough, 201…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Bullard v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Crane v. . CarswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Sasser v. Hales-Bryant Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Bullard v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jordan v. FlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965