Legal Opinion

Butler v. Kinzie

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM WARREN. Appeal from Chancery Court of 'Warren County. W. S. Bearden, Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

Turney, Ch. J.

The. facts leave no doubt of a deliberate and long considered purpose on the part of. .Complainant Butler and Defendant Kinzie to perpetrate a gross fraud on Dr. Franklin and Mrs. Nicholson.

Mrs. Nicholson answered the bill, fully setting out the facts of the fraud, and proved them clearly and definitely. Whereupon, the Chancellor relieved her of all liability on the note sued on. Franklin did not answer, and fro confesso was had as to him, upon which a decree was rendered for the amount of the notes — about $7,000 and interest.

Complainants prayed and obtained a broad appeal.

The…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheafer v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Mulrey v. CarberryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Watts v. WarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Still v. Penn. Threshermen & Farmers' Mut. Cas. Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API