Legal Opinion

Still v. Penn. Threshermen & Farmers' Mut. Cas. Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

Under the Tennessee Workmen’s Compensation Act, Mrs. Thelma Clark Still filed her petition in the Circuit Court of Sullivan County, for compensation for the death of her husband. The defendant is the Workmen’s Compensation insurance carrier of Curtis S. Williams, Jr., operator of the Kingsport Machinist School. Holding that the deceased husband of petitioner, Hiram C. 'Still, was at the time of his death, a casual employee within the definition of Code, Sec. 6856(b), the Circuit Judge dismissed the petition and the petitioner has perfected this appeal.

The relevant facts are not disputed.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sheafer v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Brademeyer v. Chickasaw Bldg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Loftis v. LoftisTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gibbons v. Roller Estates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cannon Mills, Inc. v. SpiveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Cannon Mills, Inc. v. SpiveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API