Legal Opinion

Watts v. Warner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

On July 24, 1920, complainant, Watts, entered into a lease contract with defendant Mrs. Elizabeth Warner for Nashville property, referred to as No. 113 Woodland street, for a term of five years beginning January 1, 1921. In this contract Mrs. Warner also made an agreement with reference to the lease of adjoining property as follows:

“I also agree and bind myself to rent, or lease, to said W. C. Watts the east side of this storehouse No. 1115 Woodland street, now occupied by Piggly-Wiggly, commencing at the expiration of the present lease, for a term of two years, with the privilege or refusal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harriman Land Co. v. HiltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Butler v. KinzieTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Dunscomb v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. Harris v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Campbell v. MatlockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. Swift v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  5. Kirshner v. FeigenbaumTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API