Legal Opinion
Watts v. Warner
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green
On July 24, 1920, complainant, Watts, entered into a lease contract with defendant Mrs. Elizabeth Warner for Nashville property, referred to as No. 113 Woodland street, for a term of five years beginning January 1, 1921. In this contract Mrs. Warner also made an agreement with reference to the lease of adjoining property as follows:
“I also agree and bind myself to rent, or lease, to said W. C. Watts the east side of this storehouse No. 1115 Woodland street, now occupied by Piggly-Wiggly, commencing at the expiration of the present lease, for a term of two years, with the privilege or refusal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Byrd v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Harriman Land Co. v. HiltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
- Butler v. KinzieTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Dunscomb v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Harris v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Campbell v. MatlockCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Swift v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Kirshner v. FeigenbaumTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.