Insurance Co. of North America v. Schultz
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Sandy and Allan Schultz (Insureds) appeal an adverse judgment on a claimed loss of 917 hogs under the theft clause of a commercial farm policy with Insurance Company of North America (INA).
Facts
Insureds were brothers who began raising hogs together in 1974. They developed a hog confinement system to raise the hogs. The hogs were farrowed on Sandy’s farm. Shortly after weaning, the hogs were moved a mile and one-half to Allan’s farm. They were counted and placed in a grower building. The grower building contained pens which gradually increased in size from one end of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baugher v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Long v. Glidden Mutual Insurance AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Lovas v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Coastal Plains Feeders, Inc., Cross v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.