Baugher v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schroeder, J.:
This is an action on an insurance policy to recover for loss of cattle due to theft. The action was tried to a jury in the district court of Neosho County and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. Appeal has been duly perfected by the defendant.
The underlying issue in the case concerns the construction of the provisions of the insurance policy covering theft, the appellant contending the plaintiffs’ evidence established only a mysterious disappearance of the cattle for which there was no coverage under the policy.
Martin Baugher and H.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bott v. WendlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Krug v. MILLERS'MUTUAL INSURANCE ASS'NSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Raff v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Evangelist v. Bellern Research CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. City of Pittsburg, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Burcham v. Unison Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Morrison Grain Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- BancInsure, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.