Legal Opinion

Long v. Glidden Mutual Insurance Association

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 20, 1974No. 56051PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Defendants appeal judgment in a law action tried to the court allowing plaintiffs theft insurance recovery for loss of 400 bushels of soybeans. The sole issue is the sufficiency of evidence to support trial court’s finding the loss was caused by theft. We affirm.

Trial court findings of fact in a law action are binding on us if supported by substantial evidence. We view the evidence in its most favorable light to sustain those findings. Where, as here, circumstantial evidence is relied on, it must be sufficient to make the theory asserted reasonably probable, not merely…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company v. Julien Balogh and Harriet Balogh, D/B/A Balogh's of Coral GablesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Raff v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cole v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Rich v. Dyna Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Connie's Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. Libralter Plastics, Inc v. Chubb Group of Insurance CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Bertran v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Lovas v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API