Legal Opinion

In Re Pennington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 13, 2008No. 26551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct filed formal charges against Respondent under the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR, with regard to four matters. Respondent entered into stipulations of fact on these initial matters. At the disciplinary hearing, the record was kept open pending the resolution of two new matters, and the Commission ultimately filed additional charges for the new matters. By consent order, the parties agreed the new allegations could be decided on the pleadings. Thereafter, a subpanel of the Commission issued a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. In Re HazzardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In Re TullisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re PenningtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. In Re DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. In Re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API