Legal Opinion

Association of Rural Residents v. Kitsap County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 29, 1999No. 41281-7-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*386Webster, J.

— The Apple Tree Point Partners (the Partners) filed a plat and planned unit development (PUD) application for a 123-acre, wooded and undeveloped parcel located in Kitsap County, north of Kingston. This parcel lay outside the County’s Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA), designated under the Growth Management Act (GMA). The Kitsap County Commissioners approved the project, subject to mitigation measures. The Association of Rural Residents (the Residents), a group of neighboring landowners, appealed this decision to the superior court under the Land Use Petition Act. That court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Assoc. of Rural Residents v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Swoboda v. Town of La ConnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Chaney v. FetterlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Chaney v. FetterlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Swoboda v. Town of La ConnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API