Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Akron v. Miller

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 21, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conclusions of the Court.

McCORMICK, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity wherein plaintiff seeks to have this court decree the specific performance of a written agreement signed by the defendant while in the employ of plaintiff in its tire factory at Akron, Ohio, by requiring the defendant to surrender and transfer to plaintiff all and every interest in a certain valuable invention which defendant conceived and produced while employed by plaintiff. The plaintiff also asks that the defendant be enjoined from-assigning, transferring, or using the invention. The agreement is as follows:

“Agreem…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HoughtonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
  2. (HC) Barnette v. AtchelyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. Goro v. Flowers Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
  4. Ludlow v. Flowers Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API