(HC) Barnette v. Atchely
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH BARNETTE, No. 2:20-cv-02392-KJM-CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 M. ATCHELY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this federal habeas corpus action filed 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss 19 petitioner’s federal habeas corpus application based on the Younger abstention doctrine. ECF 20 No. 9. For the reasons discussed below, the court recommends that the motion to dismiss be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.