Legal Opinion
Jane L. v. Bangerter
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 17, 1992No. Civ. 91-C-345GPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER III-IN RE PORTIONS OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge.
This matter came regularly before the Court on April 10, 1992, on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs were represented by Janet Benshoof, Rachel Pine, Eve Gartner, Jeffrey Oritt, Howard Lundgren and Simon Heller. Mary Anne Wood, Anthony Quinn, James Soper, Paul Durham and Kay Balmforth appeared for defendants. Extensive oral argument was heard, after which bench rulings were rendered and later supplemented as to several issues, 1 and the Court took certain other…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leavitt v. Jane L.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.