Legal Opinion
Jane L. v. Bangerter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1995No. Nos. 93-4044, 93-4059PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
In the instant case, we are called upon to determine the legal vitality of several provisions of Utah’s 1991 abortion law against the backdrop of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992). On January 25, 1991, Utah’s governor signed “An Act Relating to Abortion; Prohibiting Abortion Except Under Specified Circumstances.” This legislation, which prohibited all abortions except in five enumerated situations, patently violated Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). Recognizing that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Leavitt v. Jane L.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Manning v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.