Legal Opinion
Jane L. v. Bangerter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1996No. Nos. 93-4044, 93-4059PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
In Jane L. v. Bangerter, 61 F.3d 1493 (10th Cir.1995) (Jane L. IV), this court considered the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Utah laws regulating abortions. The Utah statute setting out the circumstances under which an abortion was permitted contained one section regulating abortions occurring before twenty weeks gestational age, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-7-302(2) (1995), and one section regulating abortions after twenty weeks gestational age, see id. § 302(3). The district court had declared section 302(2) unconstitutional, see Jane L. v. Bangerter, 809…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- United States v. CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Herbert Holmes, M.D. v. John Farmer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Okpalobi v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.