Legal Opinion
Nisbet v. Van Tuyl
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 10, 1955No. 11315PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
224 F.2d 66
William A. NISBET, Katherine Nisbet, Lanna M. Nisbet, Emma M. Nisbet, and J. C. Nisbet, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Ira VAN TUYL and Elsin C. Van Tuyl, doing business as V-T Drilling Company, Ray Ryan and Helen Ryan, doing business as Ryan Oil Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11315.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
June 10, 1955.
Nat H. Youngblood, William L. Craig, Herman L. McCray, D. Bailey Merrill, Evansville, Ind., James G. Wheeler, of the firm of Wheeler & Marshall, Paducah, Ky., of counsel, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joe Vol Butt, Frederick P. Bamberger, Evansville,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nisbet v. Van TuylCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Middlesboro Home Telephone Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Murphy v. HomansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Sullivan v. ColbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
- Palmer Corporation v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2003
- Howell v. JoffeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Bullen v. BrettevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- 188 LLC v. Trinity IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.