Legal Opinion
United States v. Milton James Taulbee and Laura Arleen Taulbee, Witnesses
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1973No. 73-1277, 73-1278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
These witnesses were held in contempt for refusal to testify before a federal grand jury in the Northern District of California. They had previously been granted immunity under 18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 et seq.
The Taulbees complain that they were denied adequate notice of both the contempt and immunity hearings. The Taulbees first refused to testify on January 23, 1973. They were informed at that time by the government’s attorney that_ immunity would be sought. On January 30, they refused to answer the same questions. Later on January…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Barbara Jean Fitch, and Robert Keelan Meisel, Jr., Grand Jury Witnesses, Charles Farrell Malone, Attempted IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
4Cited by5 opinions
- Michael G. Levine v. Patricia Torvik, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Raymond J. Ryan and Helen Ryan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Mark Lawrence AlterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Manry v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- John L. Manry v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985