United States v. Mark Lawrence Alter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MERRILL, HUFSTEDLER, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Alter appeals from a civil contempt adjudication stemming from his refusal to answer three questions asked by a special federal grand jury investigating potential violations of a potpourri of federal statutes. 1 We vacate and remand.
Of the many issues presented on appeal, we reach four:
1. Did the district court abuse its discretion by compelling Alter to respond to contempt charges without affording him a reasonable time adequately to prepare his defense and without giving him the uninhibited adversary…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James W. McCord Jr., A/K/A Edward J. Warren A/K/A Edward J. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Andre Willis King, United States of America v. Fred Neil PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.