Legal Opinion
United States v. Weinberg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1971No. 26903; Misc. Nos. 5484-5487PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
In the fall of 1970 a grand jury was convened at Tucson, Arizona to inquire into the matters referred to in the margin.1 The five appellants were subpoenaed by the United States to testify before the grand jury. Each refused to *745answer most of the questions asked of them before the grand jury. Each was then called before a district judge then sitting in Tucson, granted immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2514, and ordered to “testify and answer the questions asked by the grand jury.”
Each of the appellants was then returned to the grand jury room and the United States…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. S. Mohammad MarashiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Kenneth Tierney. In Re Paschal Morahan. In Re Daniel Crawford. In Re Mathias Reilly. In Re Thomas LaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- In Re Special Grand Jury No. 81-1 (Leon D. Harvey)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.