United States v. Barbara Jean Fitch, and Robert Keelan Meisel, Jr., Grand Jury Witnesses, Charles Farrell Malone, Attempted Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Fitch and Meisel have been adjudged guilty of civil contempt (after having been granted “use” immunity) for refusal to testify before a federal grand jury. Malone, already under indictment, 1 sought to intervene. This was denied. All three appeal.
We list most of the contentions and our responses:
1. That the witnesses claimed their sometime attorney had been subject to electronic surveillance by someone and they were denied an opportunity to substantiate their claim or to fully explore it.
The answer is that the government, by affidavit, made a showing that no conversations of counsel talking…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Dewey Joseph AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Witness, Anthony Russo, Jr. Anthony Russo, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- In Re Samuel Bottari, A/K/A Santo BottariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Mark Lawrence AlterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- In Re Barbara Lochiatto, in Re Patrick Lochiatto, in Re John E. DunnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Korman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Southern California Edison Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James H. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.