Alvarez v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This civilian pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant asserts in its motion that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider plaintiff’s claim for a deferred annuity. The court finds that defendant’s lack of jurisdiction defense is well founded.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeks in its complaint, filed July 26, 1985, entitlement to a deferred annuity under the Civil Service Retirement Act (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 8336(f) (1982). In order for plaintiff to be entitled to a deferred annuity, he would have to be age 62 or older and he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Lawrence R. Rosano v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- GaskinsUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Guevara v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Becton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Media Access Project, People for the American Way, and Union of Concerned Scientists v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Media Access Project, People for the American Way, and Union of Concerned Scientists v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989