Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 17, 1985No. 427-85CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

This civilian pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant asserts in its motion that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider plaintiff’s claim for a deferred annuity. The court finds that defendant’s lack of jurisdiction defense is well founded.

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeks in its complaint, filed July 26, 1985, entitlement to a deferred annuity under the Civil Service Retirement Act (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 8336(f) (1982). In order for plaintiff to be entitled to a deferred annuity, he would have to be age 62 or older and he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Goewey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Lawrence R. Rosano v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. GaskinsUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Guevara v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Becton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  4. Media Access Project, People for the American Way, and Union of Concerned Scientists v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. Media Access Project, People for the American Way, and Union of Concerned Scientists v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API