Owens v. Hellmuth & Johnson, PLLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of a debt-collection letter received by Plaintiffs Reginald D. Owens and Carolyn D. Owens from a law firm, Defendant Hellmuth & Johnson, PLLC (“H & J”), in December 2006. Plaintiffs allege that the letter violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (the “FDCPA”). H & J now moves to dismiss, arguing that the letter did not contravene the statute; Plaintiffs argue the opposite and seek summary judgment as to liability. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Gray v. Four Oak Court Ass'n, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Jackson v. Abendroth & Russell, P.C.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016
- Garcia-Contreras v. Brock & Scott, PllcDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Kalebaugh v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.